IS THE REPUTATION OF WOMEN’S CREDIBILITY AND NDP JAGMEET SINGH ON THE LINE?
- February 5, 2018
- 12:00 pm
Canadian politics, guided by the Liberal Party and specifically PM Trudeau, are running out of control influencing other party members to respond quickly in national television without practicing due diligence. PM Trudeau did the same things when the eleven-year-old girl who said that her hijab had been cut by an Asian man twice. It all ended being a hoax, but Trudeau jumped to conclusions and made a mistake in a statement on national television. In the eyes of many Canadians, they both overreacted to quick and did not look good publicly nor up to their political status.
There are three issues I want to bring to the table and ask the reader’s opinion, but before I do so, let me briefly present the facts of what recently happened.
Story and Facts:
There is a serious allegation of harassment against NDP party member Erin Weir by his Quebec caucus colleague Christine Moore who wrote in social media: “There is too many women (mostly employee) complaint to me that you were harassing to them and as a woman I would not feel comfortable to meet with you alone.” Aside from being bad English, this is a serious allegation and unfortunately the NDP leader Jagmeet Singh immediately, and without further review, called for a national news conference ordering an independent investigation and temporarily suspending Weir. The misfortune in this quick decision is that there are no accusers nor clear accusations. It is just here-say at this stage.
SOURCE: hesherman.com
SOURCE: shutterstock.com
SOURCE: usindhg.edu.pk
SOURCE: pixabay-businessmanagementdaily
On national television, Evan Solomon interviewed Weir during Question Period a few days later after the incident. Weir still does not know who his accusers are and much less, what he is being accused of doing. In fact, Christine Moore has not even confronted him with her social media accuser. Weir clearly indicates that if the rumor were true, the NDP has perfectly efficient policies established to deal with harassment. He insists that with the protection of the union, any member can file harassment grievances under their collective agreement, but this has never happened to him. He is completely surprised that this extreme inflammatory accusation has been taken to levels of slander and defamation, to the extent of potentially destroying his reputation. Not even the NDP party leader, Singh knows what the accusations are about or who specifically made the accusations.
Unfortunately, Singh has given absolute credibility to Moore’s message above Weir’s credibility and acted against another colleague as if the accusations were true. It has been four days and no specifics of this alleged harassment accusation have come forward, but Weir has been under the guillotine ever since when he was unfairly suspended by Singh. Is our system fair and equitable, or is it now going to the other extreme, which might ultimately create a backlash against women’s rights? Women’s rights are paramount and Canada should set an example, but there is always a fine line in a due process that needs serious attention and adherence to before we condemn someone.
A Good Example:
Former Toronto Mayor candidate Sarah Thompson alleges that TVO Host, Steve Paikin, made inappropriate sexual harassment comments at a lunch in 2010. The Chief Executive Office of TVO, Lisa de Wilde, has not jumped to conclusions nor has she suspended Steve Paikin. Instead, she immediately appointed a third party to investigate Ms Thomson’s allegations. However, TVO declared “based on the evidence to date, TVO sees no reason to remove Mr Paikin from his role as Host for The Agenda pending the outcome of the investigation.” No wonder Lisa de Wilde has been appointed in the past the Order of Canada, which is a prestigious recognition of “outstanding achievement, dedication to the community and service to the nation.” She is definitely a magnificent example of positive and progressive leadership.
Conclusions:
They say that “when there is smoke, there is fire.” This statement is usually accurate, but we are all going to sit tight and wait and see what really happened in the case of Mr Erin Weir. We all saw the big mistake PM Trudeau made with the matter about the hijab. Is this another political mistake?
Concerns and Questions:
- Was Christine Moore ethically and morally correct by declaring a strong poignant accusation without support on her message/story on social media (which she knows has a powerful immediate reach and impact)? If this ends up being false, inaccurate or unsubstantiated, shouldn’t Moore be held liable and have a criminal record in place along with a steep fine or jail time? You cannot just accuse someone, smear his reputation and then simply say, I am sorry.
- Shouldn’t Singh have given Mr Weir the benefit of the doubt, respecting him and backing him up until proven guilty? Like Ms Wilde, Singh should have appointed a third party to investigate before making any decisions, unless he failed to disclose some evidence, which he should have at least indicated if that were the case. Where are people’s rights of being innocent until proven guilty? If Singh runs his party by making decisions abruptly without giving it time and proper thought, should he be eligible to run for higher positions in public office? If Singh had some sort of evidence, shouldn’t he had said so publicly, before suspending Weir? Again, “where there is smoke there is fire”, but things need to be handled properly because there is always a possibility there might be no fire at all. Solid, well-educated and experienced professionals never act immediately after somebody cries wolf. They need to follow the law, they require investigating, and if the accuser is found guilty, then act accordingly with the full weight of the law. There is due diligence a politician must follow to prove the veracity of the accusations, before they run in the dark, taking action, striping somebody publicly of his duties, and left out to dry alone as if he were a criminal before knowing what really happened. Weir has been humiliated and his reputation tarnished. And there is no turning back. Do you think Singh acted within the law where everybody should be considered innocent until proven guilty? Can you imagine what they could do to an average citizen that is not even on the media’s radar?
- With accusations like these, aren’t women positioning themselves outside of the professional competitive arena by men that simply do not want or are afraid to deal with matters like this in the future? Assuming she is accurate in her accusations, shouldn’t Christine Moore have brought it to the attention of the party and the public in a professional and respectful manner, instead of portraying herself as cowardly behind the keys of a computer and without immediate proof?
Honestly, another sad day for Canada and a waste of productive work and taxpayer money. Now we wait and see how Ms Christine Moore will spring back from behind the curtains and justify her accusations. But one thing I know for sure, that the guilty party (Moore or Weis) should confront the full consequences of their actions and be penalized accordingly because either situation is really rotten and unacceptable.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Born and raised in Mexico City (D.F.) from 1958 to 1987, Rafael Carreras studied for his undergraduate degree in Economics (Mexico City) followed by a Master of Business Administration (MBA) in a joint programme between Notre Dame University (USA) and the London Graduate School of Business (England).